Petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition due to lack of documents and pleadings. The High Court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
+ W.P.(C) 6670/2015
SUMEET SALUJA & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Anoop Awasthi, Advocate with Ms.Vandana Bakshi, Advocate
versus
PUNJAB & SIND BANK AND ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Seema Gupta, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 02.03.2016
CM Nos.7736/2016, 12163/2015 & 23432/2015
Dismissed as not pressed.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MARCH 02, 2016/ mamta
Sumeet Saluja & Ors
Punjab & Sind Bank & Anr
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
