The High Court allowed a writ petition filed by Suchendra Singh regarding grievances concerning benefits under the ACP and MACP Schemes, permitting withdrawal with reserved rights to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
SUCHENDRA SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Gogna, Advocate with Mr.Chandragupt Yadav, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 01.08.2016
CM No.27222/2016
Allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 6659/2016
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
AUGUST 01, 2016 ‘st’
SUCHENDRA SINGH
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
PRATIBHA RANI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
