Single sentence order dismissing the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner due to lack of acquisition notification instructions. No substantive legal proposition established.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
PARVEZ KHAN ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr Ashutosh Dixit
versus
..... Respondents Through : Mr Siddhartha Shankar Ray for R-1. Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for R-2. Mr R. V. Sinha with Mr A. S. Singh for R-3/DMRC.
LT GOVERNOR GNCTD AND ORS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
O R D E R
% 01.08.2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since there is no notification for
acquisition in respect of the said land, he has instructions to withdraw the same.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
AUGUST 01, 2016 SR
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
Parvez Khan
Lt Governor GNCTD and Ors
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
