Single judge order granting leave to the petitioner to withdraw an ongoing writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, dismissing the impugning petition accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in case the need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
..... Petitioner Through Mr. Mohit Kumar Shah with Mr. Srikanth Srinivas, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar with Mr. Santwana, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. B.K. Sood with Mr. Shivam Rawat, Advocates for respondent Nos.2 to 5.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 16.12.2016 CM No.46300/2016
This is an application on behalf of the petitioner seeking leave to withdraw the petition. It is contended that the petitioner has applied for a fresh licence. However, because of pendency of the present petition, the said application is not being considered.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, in case, the need so arises.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
The next date 25.04.2017 is cancelled.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
DECEMBER 16, 2016/st
Prakash Heavy Metals Industries Pvt Ltd
Union of India
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
