Disposed
N.D.M.C. v. R.S.Suri
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/6291/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of writ challenges against a judgment that allowed HTPAs preferred by the respondent. The respondent withdrew those appeals following a Supreme Court judgment, rendering the writ petitions infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The writ petitions challenging the judgment allowing HTPAs are disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~23 to 27
¶2
| * IN THE HIGH COUR W.P.(C) 6290/2004 |
T OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI |
|---|---|
| N.D.M.C. | ..... Petitioner |
| Versus | |
| R.S. SURI | ..... Respondent |
| + W.P.(C) 6291/2004 |
|
| N.D.M.C. | ..... Petitioner |
| Versus | |
| R.S. SURI | ..... Respondent |
| W.P.(C) 6292/2004 | |
| N.D.M.C. | ..... Petitioner |
| Versus | |
| R.S. SURI | ..... Respondent |
| W.P.(C) 6308/2004 | |
| N.D.M.C. | ..... Petitioner |
| Versus | |
| R.S. SURI | ..... Respondent |
| W.P.(C) 6770/2004 | |
| N.D.M.C. | ..... Petitioner |
| Versus | |
| R.S. SURI | ..... Respondent |
| Counsel for petitioner: | Mr. Arjun Mitra and Mr. Abhishek Misra, Advs. for NDMC. |
| Counsel for respondent: | Mr. Rohit K. Aggarwal, Adv. |
¶3
CORAM:
¶4
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
¶5
O R D E R % 02.03.2016
¶6
- These petitions impugn the common judgment dated 1st August, 2003 of the Additional District Judge, Delhi allowing HTAs No.194/2002, 195/2002,
¶7
Page 1 of 3
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
N.D.M.C.
- respondent
R.S. SURI
Coram
AI extract
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court