This order dismisses a withdrawn writ petition. The court observes that the petitioner has filed a second petition on the same cause of action in the absence of liberty granted by the Madras High Court to file a fresh petition, rendering the current petition unmaintainable.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Gogana & Mr.Brajesh Kumar, Advocates
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 22.07.2016
petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. If such liberty is granted the petitioner would be entitled to the benefit thereof.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
JULY 22, 2016 ‘pg’
W.P.(C) 6273/2016
Page 2 of 2
Abhishek Kumar Singh
Union of India
Pradeep Nandrajog
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
