Partly allowed
Asha Rani & Ors. v. Director of Education & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/6036/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
ASHA RANI & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Adv. versus
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sumit Kr. Mishra, Adv. for R-1. with L.A Mr. Sanjeev Mathur, Zone-13. Mr. Divye Chugh and Mr. Angel Bhardwaj, Advs. for R-3 and 4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 16.12.2016
After arguments, this petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners to urge all defences of facts and law in responses to the memos, and if the school/respondent nos. 2 to 4 take any action against the petitioners, that action will be taken in accordance with the Delhi School Education Act and Rules framed thereunder as also the applicable circulars, guidelines etc of the Director of Education, and if the petitioners are in any manner aggrieved on passing of any adverse orders against the petitioners, petitioners at that stage can file appropriate independent proceedings in accordance with law.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
DECEMBER 16, 2016 ib
ASHA RANI & ORS
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS
Valmikiji Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court