Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition citing subsequent developments. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
Through: Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Jain, Advocate
versus
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.L. Gupta and Ms. Tarumika Sharma, Advocates along with Mr. Amrik Ram, Chief Manager, for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R
% 11.07.2016
Ms. Raavi Birbal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition in view of the subsequent developments.
Leave granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 11, 2016
dn
Ravinder Gupta
The State Bank of India
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
