The High Court of Delhi granted leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, disposing of pending applications.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to institute appropriate proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
MANJU SUNEJA AND ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Shaunak Kashyap, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Mukherjee, Advocate
versus
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Avneesh Saran, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
%
14.07.2016
Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this petition, in view of subsequent developments, with liberty to institute an appropriate proceeding, in accordance with law, if so advised.
Leave and liberty granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. Pending application also stands disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
dn
JULY 14, 2016
Manju Suneja and Anr
Central Bank of India
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
