E. Sita Ratnam v. Telugu Middle School & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was disposed of as not pressed after arguments. No substantive legal issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
Through: Mr. Nimish Chib, Adv.
versus
TELUGU MIDDLE SCHOOL & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Hanu Bhaskar, Adv. for R-1 to R- 3. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Niti Jain, Adv. for R-4 & R-5.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 06.12.2016
After arguments, this writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
DECEMBER 06, 2016 ib
E. Sita Ratnam
Telugu Middle School
Valmikij. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court