This order expedited the disposal of writ petitions challenging a pending Order in Original at the Central Administrative Tribunal, directing the Tribunal to prioritize the interim application.
Writ petitions CM 9169/2015 & 9171/2015 disposed with directions for the Tribunal to decide OA or interim application at earliest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signing Date:03.10.2024 17:11:32 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
"I.Mr. Tapas Tyagi, Advocate submits that he has filed vakalatnama and would be appearing for all the respondents. He prays for some time to examinethe issue in question.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has not been able to obtain instructions, but as per information gathered from the website of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi, both the OA and the interim application are still pending. He submits that the interim orders, the subject-matter of the present petitions, have continued.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that suitable directions may be given to the Tribunal for early disposal of the OA, or at least the interim^ application. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that he has no objectionand wouldjoin the petitionersin the prayerthat the OA and the interim application should be decided at the earliest. He also submitsthat notwithstandingpendencyof the contemptapplication,the OA and the interim application may be heard and decided.
Recording the aforesaid statement of the learned counsel for the respondentsand the petitioner,we disposeof the presentwrit petitions,with
1
a request to the Tribunal to take up the OA, and if it is not possible,the interimapplication,for disposal.CMNos.9169/2015and 9171/2015are also disposed of.
-•// ^ SANJIVKHANNA,J Y NAJ]MIWAZIRI,J
MAY 12, 2016 tp ^
Petitioner
The State of Gujarat
Sanjay Khanna
Y.N. Naizmi
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
