Rr Kabel Limited v. M/S Incab Industries Ltd. & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A challenge to sick-company rehabilitation proceedings alleged that a different BIFR Bench decided the matter from the one that heard it. The court rejected this preliminary objection, finding continued hearings and no denial of opportunity or prejudice. The writ petitions remained pending for hearing on merits.
What the court decided
$~S1 to 4
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 3rd October, 2013 % Date of decision: 24th April, 2014 + W.P.(C) 5010/2011 & 10169/2011 RR KABEL LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus M/S INCAB INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 5971/2011 PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus TATA STEEL LIMITED AND ORS ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 5954/2011 & C.M.No.12050/2011 INCAB SRAMIK SANGH & ORS ..... Petitioners versus APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL & ORS ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 5197/2011 & C.Ms.No.10541/2011, 219/2012, 3077/2012. ALL INDIA INCAB INDUSTRIES EMPLOYEES FEDERATION & ORS. ..... Petitioners versus AAIFR & ORS. ..... Respondents
W.P.(C) Nos.5010, 10169, 5971 of 2011, 5954/2011 & C.M.No.12050/2011, W.P.(C) No.5197/2011 & CMs.No.10541/2011, 219/2012, 3077/2012
Page 1 of 52
Present: Mr Rajiv Nayyar, Sr.Adv. with Ms B.Sunita Rao,
Mr Darpan Wadhwa, Mr Anil, Advs. for R.R.Kable Ltd.
Mr Prateek Jalan, Mr Aditya Sharma, Adv. for Fesqua and Kamla Mills.
Mr Vivek Sibbal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Ankur S.Kulkarni, for INCAB Industries.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Did the change in BIFR's Bench during rehabilitation proceedings violate the requirement that the authority deciding must hear?
Did Section 18(3)(b) of SICA implicitly require a hearing when considering objections and suggestions?
Did the petitioners waive any objection to the changed Bench, or suffer prejudice from the change?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RR KABEL LIMITED
- respondent
M/S INCAB INDUSTRIES LTD.
- petitioner
PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.
- respondent
TATA STEEL LIMITED
- petitioner
INCAB SRAMIK SANGH
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court