A writ petition seeking setting aside notices regarding gratuity was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner upon undertaking to make a representation, with the court granting time limits for both parties.
petition dismissed as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
MOOL CHAND SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Singh, Advocate.
versus
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O.P. Gaggar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH
O R D E R % 26.02.2016
The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia , seeking setting aside of notice dated 30.07.2014 and letter dated 03.10.2015 issued by respondents.
Mr. O.P. Gaggar, learned counsel for respondents submits that notice dated 15.07.2015 has been issued but the amount of gratuity has not been forfeited.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will make representation to the respondents within a period of one week and respondents may consider the same in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for respondents submits that after receiving the petitioner’s representation, the same shall be decided within a period of four weeks.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is
satisfied with the aforesaid and seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
As prayed, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to move a representation to the respondents within one week and the respondents will decide the same within a period of four weeks thereafter.
V.P.VAISH, J
FEBRUARY 26, 2016 hs
MOOL CHAND SHARMA
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.
V.P.VAISH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
