Three petitioners seeking selection letters for Central Armed Forces posts were granted relief to approach the Staff Selection Commission to respond to their legal notices within four weeks, with the petitions disposed of at the admission stage.
Directions to respondent to consider and respond to legal notices within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6, 8 & 16
SAAJAN THAPA ..... Petitioner MUKESH CHANDRA ..... Petitioner DINESH NATH ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. B.C. Bhatt, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Poonam Kalia, Advocate, CGSC with Mr. Arpit Shukla, Advocate in W.P.(C) 4650/2016. Mr. Prasanta Varma with Ms. Prativa Varma and Mr. Vinod Tiwari, Advocates in W.P.(C) 4653/2016. Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Mr. Shivam Chanana and Ms. Priyanshu Sinha, Advocates in W.P.(C) 3036/2016.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 23.05.2016
alia for directions to the respondent No.1/Staff Selection Commission to
issue letters of selection in their favour for undergoing training for the post
of Constable (GD) in the BSF/CISF/SSB/CRPF/Assam Rifles.
WPC No.4650/2016 & connected matters
Page 1 of 3
WPC No.4650/2016 & connected matters
Page 2 of 3
No.1/SCC, they shall be entitled to seek their remedies, if so advised, in accordance with law.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MAY 23, 2016 sk/mk
WPC No.4650/2016 & connected matters
Page 3 of 3
Saajan Thapa
Mukesh Chandra
Dinesh Nath
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
