The High Court of Delhi dismissed the present petition as withdrawn since the petitioner did not press the claim, following the respondent's submission that the counter-claim should be dealt by the Arbitral Tribunal.
The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
versus KP TRANSMISSION PVT ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ashwini Mata, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Akhil Sibal, Mr.Sunil Mittal, Mr.Vibhor Aggarwal, Mr.Manu Sahini and Mr.Vipul Wadhwa, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
O R D E R % 17.08.2016
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that without prejudice, the respondent has no objection if the counter claim filed by the petitioner be taken on record and the same be dealt first by the Arbitral Tribunal.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that two Arbitral Tribunals have already been constituted and the claims are different. He does not press the present petition. The same is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
I.A. No.8434/2016 (for preponement of date)
Reply has been filed by the petitioner.
The above mentioned application has already been disposed of by order dated 4th August, 2016.
Dasti to both the parties.
MANMOHAN SINGH, J.
AUGUST 17, 2016/jk
HPCL Mittal Pipeline
KP Transmission Pvt
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
