Petitioner withdrawn writ petition challenging rejection of building plan sanction. Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to advance specific arguments regarding ownership.
Permission granted to withdraw petition with liberty to argue specific submissions regarding ownership.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
..... Petitioner Through Mr. HImanshu Upadhyaya and Mr. Shivam Tripathi, Advs.
versus
THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS
..... Respondents Through Ms. Mini Pushkarna, standing counsel with Ms. Namrata Mukin and Ms. Anushruti, Advs. for MCD. Mr Ajay Verma, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Mishra and Ms. Ishaa Verma, Advs for DDA. Ms. Anusha Oja and Ms. Sunita Bansal, Advs for R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 06.09.2016
The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 18.04.2012 passed by the Assistant Engineer, Building Plan wherein his application seeking sanction of a building plan qua WZ-139, Lajwanti Garden, New Delhi had been turned down.
After some arguments, on the opposition raised by the respondent that this order is appealable under the provisions of Section 347-B (1)(f) of the DMC Act, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He
however seeks liberty of this Court to argue all those arguments which are made in the present writ petition which includes the submission that by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 06.09.2010, he had become the owner of this piece of land. Permission is granted. The rights and contention of both the parties are kept open.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
SEPTEMBER 06, 2016 A
HARISH ARORA
THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
