The petitioner unconditionally withdrew the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition and accompanying applications were dismissed as withdrawn without substantive adjudication or issue determination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
DR. KAUSHIK ROY ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Shri Singh, Advocate.
versus
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to unconditionally withdraw the present writ petition.
Consequently, the writ petition and the applications are dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn.
MANMOHAN, J
MAY 19, 2016 KA
Dr. Kaushik Roy
Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
