Airports Authority of India v. Adm/Lac (South West) & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signing Date:01.10.2024 17:12:40 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
V.
jurisdiction. It is only the ADM appointed as Nodal Officer by this. Court vide order dated 06.11.2012 who alone would have the; jurisdictipn to decide the matter in question. Learned counsel for the petitioner will abide by this statement. Learned counsel for the petitioner additionally submits that the order of the ADM has been challenged on merits as well.
^
®
In this view of the matter, this Court is of the view that this matter can be disposed of by the ADM (Nodal officer), New Delhi who has the requisite jurisdiction to decide the same. The learned ADM shall decide the matter within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Needless to state that all the pleadings and arguments taken in the present petition would be available to the petitioner before the ADM (Nodal Officer). The learned ADM ^Nodal Officer), New Delhi will pass orders uninfluenced by any observations made by this Court in this order. I
Petitions disposed of in the above terms.
^
%
L;
JULY 13, 2016 ndn
INDERMEET KAUR, J
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court