The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's withdrawal of the writ petition regarding a compensation claim decision by Respondent No. 3, with liberty to assail such decision later.
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw the petition assessing the decision dated 27.01.2016, if so advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 18.07.2016
Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 states that the petitioner’s claim seeking compensation has been determined by them and the decision taken thereon has been communicated by letter dated 15.07.2016.
In view of the foregoing, Mr. P. Nagesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition at this stage with liberty to assail the decision dated 27.01.2016, arrived at by respondent No.3, in accordance with law, if so advised.
Leave and liberty granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 18, 2016 dn
GOODSKILL SECURITIES AND SERVICES LIMITED
UNION OF INDIA
NCOEX
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
