Petitioner sought review of an order dismissing his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Counsel withdrew the petition. Court dismissed the petition with liberty to pursue other remedies.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Varun K. Chopra, Adv.
versus
SOFTWAREONE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR
..... Respondents Through Nemo.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Impugned order is dated 09.02.2016. There were three applications disposed of by the impugned order. Petitioner is aggrieved by that part of the order vide which his application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC stood dismissed.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would not be pressing this petition. This petition is dismissed as withdraw with liberty granted to the petitioner to take any other legal remedy which is available to him.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 16, 2016 ndn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MAYANK SHRIVASTAVA
SOFTWAREONE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
