Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking CBI investigation into alleged misappropriation of funds for 'Bhojtal' renovation. The court held the petition could not be maintained as proceedings against the accused are already pending in Allahabad High Court.
The petition was dismissed without expressing an opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Mimansak Bhardwaj, Advocate for Union of India
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R
W.P.(C) 34/2016
Page 1 of 2
proceedings before the appropriate forum.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JAYANT NATH, J
JANUARY 08, 2016/v
W.P.(C) 34/2016
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a PIL seeking CBI investigation into misappropriation of funds for renovation can be maintained when proceedings are pending in the High Court of Allahabad against the accused.
Whether the present petition can be maintained in the Delhi High Court given that the property is in Uttar Pradesh and proceedings are pending in Allahabad High Court.
P.K. Sharma
Union of India
Jayant Nath
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
