Disposed

Gvk Jaipur Kishangarh Expressway Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

Delhi HC9 May 2016W.P.(C)/3298/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner withdrew challenge to fee amendment letters but sought disposal of representation regarding smooth project operation. Court disposed of petition with direction to NHAI to decide representation within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to decide petitioner's representation dated 1st April, 2016 within six weeks.

Gvk Jaipur Kishangarh Expressway Pvt. Ltd. Vs… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~3

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3298/2016 &CM APPLs.14050-14051/2016

¶3

GVK JAIPUR KISHANGARH EXPRESSWAY PVT LTD

¶4

..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr.Gopal Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ajay Bhargava, Ms Chinmayee Chandra and Ms.Abhisaar Bairagi, Advocates

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.K.K.Sharma, Sr.Advocte with Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate for NHAI

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

¶9

O R D E R % 09.05.2016

¶10

Present writ petition has been filed challenging letters dated 21^st March, 2016 and 31^st March, 2016 issued by respondent No.2-NHAI whereby the petitioner has been directed to implement the amendment in the toll fee in accordance with the Central Government’s Notification dated 4^th March, 2016 at Jaipur-Kishangarh Section in the State of Rajasthan.

¶11

Mr.Gopal Jain, learned senior counsel for petitioner fairly states that as the legality and validity of the Notification dated 4^th March, 2016 has not been challenged and the same has now been given effect to, he does not wish to press the present writ petition with regard to the challenge to the two letters dated 21^st March, 2016 and 31, March, 2016.

¶12

He, however, prays that the petitioner’s representation dated 1^st April, 2016 to ensure smooth operation of project ‘Highway’ be dealt with by the respondent NHAI.

¶13

This Court is of the view that the request made by Mr.Gopal Jain, learned senior counsel for the petitioner is fair and reasonable.

¶14

Consequently, present writ petition and applications are disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 1^st April, 2016 in accordance with law and the Agreement dated 8^th May, 2002 executed between the parties as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six weeks.

¶15

However, it is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all parties are left open.

¶16

MANMOHAN, J

¶17

MAY 09, 2016 sv

Gvk Jaipur Kishangarh Expressway Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gvk Jaipur Kishangarh Expressway Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jatin Chandok and Ors. Vs the Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Kv Aromatics Pvt. Ltd. Vs UOI and Ors.

M.C.Gupta Vs Ignou & Ors.

M/S.S.K.Metal & Co. Vs Commissioner of Customs & Ors.

Radha Nagpal & Anr. Vs UOI & Ors.

Dashrath Singh Vs Andhra Bank & Ors.

Alpha Infravision Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shashi Ranjan Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jatin Chandok and Ors. Vs the Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Kv Aromatics Pvt. Ltd. Vs UOI and Ors.

Sumit Kumar Vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

R.S. Tokas (Retd.) & Ors. Vs Defence Services Officers Welfare Fund (Dsowf) & Ors.

M/S. Punj Lloyd Aviation Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Rashtriya Prigya Drishti Sansthan Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.