Dismissed

Anil Gulati v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC2 May 2016W.P.(C)/3288/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition challenging office orders directing the petitioner to report to a hospital in Greater Noida. The Court accepted the respondents' assurance to decide a pending representation within two weeks and dismissed the petition with consequential directions.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with direction to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 1st April, 2016 within two weeks under written intimation, keeping in mind previous directions.

Anil Gulati Vs Union of India & Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 3288/2016 & C.M. 13986/2016

¶4

ANIL GULATI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.C. Yadav, Advocate

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

¶9

¶10

O R D E R 02.05.2016

¶11

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing of the office orders dated 8^th December, 2015 and 15^th December, 2015, whereunder he has been directed to report to the IG, Referral Hospital, Greater Noida.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this is the second round of litigation that the petitioner has had to initiate against the respondents. In the first writ petition filed by the petitioner [W.P.(C) 6286/2015], he had sought cancellation of his transfer order directing him to report at Shillong on the ground that his mother is 83 years old and suffers from cancer. After considering the stand taken by both sides, the writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 7^th September, 2015, with

¶13

Page 1 of 3

¶14

W.P.(C) 3288/2016

¶15

directions to the respondent-ITBP to ensure that the petitioner is retained in Delhi against the leave vacancy of one Ms. Poonam Ahuja and make consequential orders thereto. It was also directed that the duration of the petitioner’s posting would correspond to the leave sanctioned to Ms. Poonam Ahuja.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the petitioner was directed to report to the Addl. Director General (Medicine) at Tigri Camp, Delhi, which was subsequently temporarily shifted to Greater Noida. He submits that vide order dated 15^th December, 2015, the petitioner was directed to report to IG (Medical) at Referral Hospital, Greater Noida, while the officer with whom he was attached i.e. Addl. Director General (Medicine) was posted back at Tigri Camp, Delhi. Vide representation dated 1^st April, 2016, the petitioner raised his grievance with the competent authority, which has remained pending. Hence the present petition.

¶17

Mr. P.C. Yadav, Advocate, who appears on behalf of the respondents on advance notice, assures this Court that the petitioner’s representation dated 1^st April, 2016 shall be considered and decided within two weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, under written intimation to him.

¶18

In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition and the application are disposed of with directions to the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation dated 1^st April, 2016 (Annexure P-7) within two weeks from today, under written intimation to him. The order shall be passed keeping in mind the directions issued in W.P.(C) 6286/2015, decided on

¶19

Page 2 of 3

¶20

W.P.(C) 3288/2016

¶21

7^th September, 2015, as also the observations made by the IG (Medical), RH, ITBP in the order dated 5^th June, 2014, which is a part of office notings, relevant extract whereof has been enclosed as Annexure P-13 to the present petition.

¶22

HIMA KOHLI, J

¶23

SUNIL GAUR, J

¶24

MAY 02, 2016 r/vn

¶25

Page 3 of 3

¶26

W.P.(C) 3288/2016

Anil Gulati v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Gulati v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhdin Verma & Ors. Vs UOI & Ors.

Next Radio Limited Vs Prasar Bharti & Anr.

Citizen Rights Foundation & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

A.I.Metals (P) Ltd. Vs Additional Director General & Ors.

K.S.Traders Vs Union of India & Ors.

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mangali Impex Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

D.P. Sharma Vs M/S Bses Rajdhani Power Limited

Naik Kuldeep Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mahavir Singh Aswal Vs Union of India and Anr.

Raghvendracharya Vs Union of India and Anr.

Nidhi Kumari Vs Union of India and Anr.

Sujeet Kumar Vs Union of India and Anr.

Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Vs S.K. Shrivastava