Remanded
Ashok Baugh v. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/3133/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18 $~
ASHOK BAUGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 11.07.2016
Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 10th March, 2016 passed by the Appellate Authority, Chief Commercial Manager communicated by Deputy Chief Commercial Manager, FM-1.
Learned counsel for petitioner states that by the aforesaid communication, the Appellate Authority has dismissed the petitioner’s appeal by a non-speaking order.
A perusal of the paper book reveals that the order in appeal is a nonreasoned one.
It is settled law that reasons are the link between the order and the mind of its maker and every quasi-judicial order must be supported by reasons. In Mahabir Prasad Santosh Kumar vs. State of U.P. & Ors., (1970) 1 SCC 764 , it was held that the conclusion of quasi-judicial authority must be fair and just and for ensuring this, he must record reasons which
would show the ultimate mental process leading from the dispute to its solution.
In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order dated 10th March, 2016 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Chief Commercial Manager for a fresh decision after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
The appeal shall be disposed of by way of a reasoned order within a period of eight weeks.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
MANMOHAN, J
JULY 11, 2016 js
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mahabir Prasad Santosh Kumar vs. State of U.P. & Ors.Referred¶12
Mahabir Prasad Santosh Kumar vs. State of U.P. & Ors., (1970) 1 SCC 764 · Who else cites this
Ashok Baugh
Union of India
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court