The High Court of Delhi permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition challenging public tender participation, retaining liberty for the petitioner to raise issues in future tenders, and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to agitate issues in future tenders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
A2Z INFRA ENGINEERING LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Anish Kapur, Adv. with Ms Divya Bhalla, Adv.
versus
POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ANR... Respondents Through: Mr Ravi Praksh, CGSC with Mr Aditya Dewan, Adv. for UOI. Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr Pawan Upadhyay,
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R
% 08.11.2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition inasmuch as the petitioner did not participate in the subject tenders. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to reserve its right to agitate the issues raised in the writ petition in case they arise in future tenders.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
NOVEMBER 08, 2016 kb
A2Z INFRA ENGINEERING LTD.
POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
