The Court held that since the writ petition has been transferred to the Supreme Court and is pending there, it need not be listed in this High Court, and the Registry will make a noting.
The writ petition need not be listed in the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~03
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Chandan Kumar and Ms. Vandana Mishra, Advocates. versus SURJAN SINGH AND ORS ..... Respondent Through Ms. Gauri Puri, Advocate. Mr. Anil Soni, Advocate for R-46.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 26.02.2016
Learned counsel for the parties state that this writ petition has been transferred to the Supreme Court and is pending before the Supreme Court.
In view of the statement made, this petition need not be listed before the Court as the writ petition itself has been transferred to the Supreme Court. The Registry will make noting in the records and the writ petition will not be treated as pending in the High Court.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
FEBRUARY 26, 2016 NA
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd
Surjan Singh and Ors
Sanjiv Khanna
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
