The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the Allahabad High Court had already adjudicated the issue in Federation of Noida Residents Welfare Association case, leaving nothing for merits adjudication.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SARASWATHI V KRISHNAN ..... Petitioner
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondent
Counsel for the Petitioner : Nemo. Counsel for the respondent : Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD; Mr.Gaurav Sarin with Ms.Abha Malhotra and Mr.H.K. Alag, Advs. for R-1; Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Adv. for NOIDA Authority.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
%
O R D E R 07.12.2016
None appears for the petitioner.
Heard the learned counsel for the respondent No.6.
In view of the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dated 28.10.2016 in Public Interest Litigation No.60214/2012 titled Federation of Noida Residents Welfare Association vs. Noida Toll Bridge Company Ltd. and Others , we are of the view that nothing survives for adjudication on merits of the case.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
CHIEF JUSTICE
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
DECEMBER 07, 2016/ pmc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication on merits in light of the Allahabad High Court judgment in Federation of Noida Residents Welfare Association case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Public Interest Litigation No.60214/2012 titled Federation of Noida Residents Welfare Association vs. Noida Toll Bridge Company Ltd. and OthersExplained¶13
Saraswathi V Krishnan
Union of India
Noida Authority
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
