The judgment is a procedural order listing a matter for relisting on a future date without any substantive disposition, reasoning, or legal proposition. It is too thin to generate a meaningful headnote or summary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH & TRAINING & ANR
..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Deepa Rai, Adv.
versus
ANITA GUPTA & ANR
..... Respondent Through: Respondent/Review Petitioner in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 01.06.2016
REVIEW PET. 284/2016 (Review of Judgment dated 05.02.2016, by respondent No.1) CM APPL. 22174/2016 (Exemption)
Relist on 02.06.2016.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
JUNE 01, 2016 /acm
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH & TRAINING
ANITA GUPTA
SANJIV KHANNA
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
