Two writ petitions challenging RBI guidelines on publishing wilful defaulter photographs were disposed of as no substantial question remained after the respondent provided a circular clarifying the scope.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13. + 14.
JAY POLYCHEM (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Shubhendu Kaushik, Advocate
versus
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA ..... Respondent
Through : Mr. O.P. Gaggar, Advocate Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocate for RBI Mr. Vineet Malhotra, Advocate
AND
Through : Mr. Ashim Vachhar, Advocate
versus
IDBI BANK LIMITED ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ajay Bahl, Advocate Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocate for RBI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
O R D E R % 06.12.2016
WP(C) 2462/2016 and WP(C)3122/2016 Page 1 of 2
to the lending institutions not to publish photographs of defaulting borrowers except of those, who have been declared as a wilful defaulters in terms of para 2 of the said Circular. While taking on record the said Circular, counsels for the petitioners were permitted to obtain instructions from their clients if anything further survives for consideration in the present petitions.
HIMA KOHLI, J
DECEMBER 06, 2016 sk
WP(C) 2462/2016 and WP(C)3122/2016 Page 2 of 2
Jay Polychem (India) Ltd. & Ors.
Central Bank of India
Mohan Lal Sharma & Ors.
IDBI Bank Limited
Hima Kohli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
