Disposed

Maya Rani v. National Bal Bhawan & Anr.

Delhi HC4 Oct 2016W.P.(C)/2197/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petitioner seeking interim accommodation in a vacant room set for domestic assistants. The court permitted usage on the condition that it remains subject to the incumbent Director's approval and does not prejudice statutory rights.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to occupy the vacant one room set for domestic assistants as an interim measure, subject to the incumbent Director's approval.

Maya Rani Vs National Bal Bhawan & Anr. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~174

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2197/2015

¶4

MAYA RANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Vinod Tiwari and Ms. Santwana, Advs. for R-2.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 04.10.2016

¶8

CM No.15632/2016 (u/S. 151 CPC by petitioner)

¶9

Mr. Rajappa, the learned counsel for respondent no.1, states upon instructions that a one room set is vacant in the quarters for domestic assistants attached to the Director’s bungalow. He, however, submits that since there is no Director at the moment, therefore, no order in this regard can be passed by the Deputy Director as it is the Board of Management of the respondent institution which has to take a decision in this regard.

¶10

The Court is of the view that as per the order dated 09.03.2015 the petitioner was to be accommodated, as an interim measure, at such place in the Director’s bungalow as may be available. Almost 19 months have gone by and the said accommodation has been lying unoccupied.

¶11

In the circumstances, considering the exigency and the requirement of the petitioner, who vacated the Director’s bungalow along with her three

¶12

minor children and has to provide for them, the one room set of the domestic assistants shall be permitted to be occupied by the petitioner only as an interim measure, on the condition that her continuance in the said accommodation will be subject to approval by the incumbent Director. The petitioner’s right to apply for staff quarters in terms of the applicable Rules shall remain unprejudiced.

¶13

The right of the incumbent Director to utilize the Director’s bungalow and the aforesaid one room set accommodation for his domestic assistant(s) would not be prejudiced by this order.

¶14

The application stands disposed off in the above terms.

¶15

Dasti under the signature of the Court Master.

¶16

NAJMI WAZIRI, J

¶17

OCTOBER 04, 2016 /kk

Maya Rani v. National Bal Bhawan & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maya Rani v. National Bal Bhawan & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Nath Dhir Vs DDA

Ti-W Commissioner of Income Tax. Central-Li Vs M/S Cipl Estate Pvt. Ltd.

The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-Ii Vs M/S Pacific Bulidcon Pvt. Ltd.

The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-Ii Vs Sh. Sudershn Kumar Bansal

Abdul Quadir Khan Vs UOI & Ors.

Woodward Governor(India)Ltd. Vs Assistant Comissioner of Income Tax

M/S Woodward Governor (India) Ltd. Vs Commr of Income Tax-Xvii & Ors.

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs Shanti Sagar Malhotra & Anr.

Aita Ram & Ors. Vs Hindustan Times Limited & Anr.

A.K. Dahiya Vs Chairman M.G.I. and Ors.

Shadma Praveen Vs Gnct of Delhi & Anr.

Amar Nath Thakur Vs Union of India

Jitendra Nath Vs Roop Chand Yadav & Anr.

Nirulas Corner House Pvt. Ltd. Vs Jitender Kumar Pant