Petitioner failed to appear in multiple sittings and at second call. The High Court dismissed the writ petition and connected applications for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DEEPAK KHOSLA ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
HONBLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Grover, Mr. Nischal Vij and Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advs. for Resp./ NDMC. Sh. Viraj. R. Datar, Advocate, for Resp./DHC. Mr. Rajiv Bansal and Ms. Arpital, Advs. for Resp./ DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 08.12.2016
We notice from the record that the petitioner did not appear on these dates: 02.05.2014, 01.08.2014, 07.11.2014, 13.02.2015 and 14.08.2015. Today as well there is no appearance even at the second call after one passover.
The writ petition and the pending applications are, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
DECEMBER 08, 2016 /kk
Deepak Khosla
Honble President of India and Ors
S. Ravindra Bhat
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
