Petitioner withdrew the writ petition with limited liberty to avail civil remedies. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to avail civil remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5.
Through: Ms. Mani Gupta, Mr. Rajat Kumar and Mr. Rahul Mehra, Advs.
versus
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONIC & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for UOI. Mr. R.A. Iyer, Proxy for Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for R-2 to 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R % 04.01.2016
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
JANUARY 04, 2016 ‘pp’..
MANOJ GARG
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONIC & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
