This short order dismisses a writ petition challenging recruitment rules for deputy director posts in the Rehabilitation Council of India. The matter was dismissed for default as no appearance was made by the petitioner or against him on the date of hearing.
Petition dismissed for default of appearance. No interim stay or substantive orders were passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-10
Date of decision : 18th February, 2016 S.P. PARASHER ..... Petitioner Through: None. versus UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, J
W.P.(C) No. 19029/2006 Page 1 of 2
Assistant Secretaries, who are allegedly discharging similar responsibilities, are considered eligible for promotion.
This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for default of appearance.
GITA MITTAL, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 18, 2016
kr
W.P.(C) No. 19029/2006 Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging recruitment rules should be adjudicated upon in the absence of the petitioner's appearance.
S.P. ParasHER
UOI AND ORS.
Gita Mittal
I.S. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
