In this PIL, the petitioner challenged the Public Exhibition Certificate granted to the film 'Aligarh'. The Court found that the petition was based on the petitioner's individual view without established public interest elements and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29.
MOHAMMAD AHSAN KHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Joginder Sukhija, Advocate.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Ms. Shreya Sinha and Ms.Rajul Jain, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R % 02.03.2016
W.P.(C) 1842/2016
Page 1 of 2
petitioner and absolutely no case is made out to show any element of public interest is involved.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JAYANT NATH, J
MARCH 02, 2016 ‘rb’
W.P.(C) 1842/2016
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a public interest litigation has been appropriately filed where the petitioner seeks a direction to withdraw a film certification certificate.
Mohammad Ahsan Khan
Union of India
Jayant Nath
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
