Writ petition was disposed of by the court upon the petitioner seeking liberty to file a criminal writ petition, leaving all rights and contentions open without adverse orders.
liberty to file a criminal writ petition; rights and contentions left open
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
#32
$~
VIBHOR ANAND ..... Petitioner Through Dr. Adish C. Aggarwala, Senior Advocate with Mr. V.K. Anand, Mr. Abhinav Singh, Mr. Himanshu Pandey, Mr. Abhishek Dwivedi, Mr. Prashant Kumar Umrao, Advocates. Petitioner in person.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Gautam Narayan and Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel (Civil), Mr. Amrit Singh, Mr. Aditya Swaroop Aggarwal, Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Mr. Shekhar Budakoti and Mr. Sanyog Bahadur, Advocates for R-2&3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 23.02.2016
Learned senior counsel for petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a criminal writ petition.
With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition and application are disposed of. However, rights and contentions of all parties are left open.
MANMOHAN, J
FEBRUARY 23, 2016 rn
Vibhor Anand
Union of India
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
