Petitioner challenged contract status. Court noted fresh tender floated and contract extended till 12.08.2016, rendering petition infructuous and disposed of.
Petition disposed of as nothing survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
M/S WELL PROTECT MANPOWER SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Tarkeshwar Nath, Advocate.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms Isha Khanna, Advocate for Ms Nidhi Raman, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Dr Rishi Anand, Nodal Officer, Outsourced Services, SRHC Hospital, Narela
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
%
O R D E R 12.07.2016
The learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 on instructions from Dr Rishi Anand, MO Incharge, Outsourced Services, SRHC Hospital, Narela, states that the subject contract has already been worked out and a fresh tender has been floated. However, as the tender has not been finalised the period of the contract has been extended till 12.08.2016.
In view of this submission, nothing survives in this writ petition. The same stands disposed of.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
JULY 12, 2016 NS
M/S WELL PROTECT MANPOWER SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
