Petitioner through counsel stated that the writ petition is not pressed due to the status report filed. The petition was disposed as not pressed and the miscellaneous application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
MOHAMMAD AFSAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Shampa Chatterjee, Adv.
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through :Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R D E R % 01.03.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the status
report filed by the respondent no. 1, writ petition is not pressed. Writ
petition is disposed of as not pressed. Miscellaneous application is disposed
of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
MARCH 01, 2016 rb
MOHAMMAD AFSAR
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
