The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition and pending application as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal without limitation objections.
Disposal of W.P.(C) 11458/2016 and CM 44931/2016 with liberty to file appeal within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PAWAN MEHRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Neeraj Dev Gaur, Ms. Mahima Rathi, Advs.
versus
THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Keshav Mohan, Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advs. for R-1/EPFO along with Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Enforcement Officer and Mr. A.P. Jain, S. Supervisor Mr. Arun Kumar, Ms. Shanaz Khan, Mr. Raghav Tiwari, Advs. for R-3
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 07.12.2016
W.P.(C) 11458/2016 & CM 44931/2016
not raise the objection of limitation in the appeal. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner shall submit the bank guarantee in lieu of the pre-deposit of 75% before the Appellate Tribunal.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
DECEMBER 07, 2016 dk
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pawan Mehra
The Employees Provident Fund Organisation
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
