the Directorate of Enforcement, NDMC for release of the goods which the petitioner was vending from the said site and which were seized on 20th November, 2015 and bearing the endorsement dated 23rd November, 2015, purportedly of the Area Inspector of the Police. It is argued that the same is proof of the petitioner having been dispossessed on 20th November, 2015. 5. On enquiry, whether the goods have been released to the petitioner, the counsel for the petitioner states that the same have not been. 6. The counsel for the petitioner has also drawn attention to the order dated 13th March, 2015 of the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.141/2015 titled Prem Singh Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi directing temporary tehbazari rights to be given to the appellant in that case. It is contended that the petitioner was removed from his vending site inspite of the said order and at least two other orders of the Division Bench. 7. The Division Bench in the order dated 13th March, 2015 dealt with the rights of the appellant before it and did not issue any directions in rem, of which advantage can be drawn by the petitioner. Moreover, the Division Bench referred to the bureaucratic inefficiency in constitution of the Town Vending Committee to be constituted under the Street Vendors Act aforesaid and which Committee is required to ultimately identify the street vending sites and the persons eligible to street vend therefrom. Notice may be taken of the fact that since then the Rules under the Street Vendors Act have been framed and the Scheme of street vending has also been prepared and notified and the constitution of the Town Vending Committee is now imminent. In fact one of the reasons for delay in constitution of Town Vending Committee is the disputes as to who should be the representative of W.P.(C) 11450/2015 Page 2 of 3
