Dismissed
Seema Ojha & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/11380/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioners had treated the High Court as a court of first instance and sought implementation of Tribunal orders. An adequate remedy existed under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (Section 27). The court held that the petitioners must first approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. The writ petition was not entertained.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition not entertained; petitioners required to be headed to the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 27 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.