Motion for continuation of interim order to permit reply filing. Respondent AAI assured time for reply, making continuation order unnecessary.
Continuation of interim order deemed unnecessary as respondent allowed time for reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
W.P.(C) 8183/2015
AERO CLUB OF INDIA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Adv.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Digvijay Rai, Adv. for AAI.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Digvijay Rai, Adv. for AAI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R
% 11.07.2016
W.P.(C) 8183/2015
Page 1 of 2
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
JULY 11, 2016 Bs..
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 8183/2015
Aero Club of India & Anr.
Union of India & Ors.
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
