Allowed

Raj Kumar Singh v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Delhi HC16 Nov 2016W.P.(C)/10841/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court treated the petitioner's writ petition as a representation regarding street vending rights. Due to the lack of clarity on the Town Vending Committee's formation, directions were issued for the Commissioner to file an affidavit specifying the timeline.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition treated as a representation; Commissioner directed to file affidavit regarding formation of Town Vending Committee.

Raj Kumar Singh Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~9

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 10841/2016 RAJ KUMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner

¶4

Through Mr. Dharmender Sharma and Ms. Monika Singh, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR

¶7

..... Respondents

¶8

Through Mr. Roshan Lal Goel and Ms. Anju Gupta, Advocates for respondent no.1/SDMC.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

¶11

O R D E R % 16.11.2016 CMs.APPL42500-42501/2016(Exemption)

¶12

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

The application stands disposed of.

¶14

W.P.(C) 10841/2016

¶15

The petitioner claims to be a street vendor since 2007 and claims to have been running his stall at NDSE Part-II at the side wall of A-41, beside the colony gate on tehbazari basis. In support of this plea, two challans of 2007 and 2015 have been placed on record.

¶16

After some hearing in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition be treated as a representation to the South Delhi Municipal Corporation(SDMC). Learned counsel for the respondent, who enters appearance on behalf of the South Delhi Municipal Corporation while accepting notice, submits that this writ petition will be treated as a

¶17

representation and shall be placed before the Town Vending Committee(TVC) as and when it is formed. We are dissatisfied with the answer to the query raised by us as to when the Town Vending Committee would be formed. Learned counsel has no answer to the same. While disposing of this matter with a direction that this writ petition shall be treated as a representation and placed before the Town Vending Committee since various other matters are pending, we direct the Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation to file his affidavit in any of the pending matters which are likely to be listed on 09.12.2016 giving details as to when the Town Vending Committee would be formed.

¶18

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶19

Dasti to the parties under the signature of the Assistant Registrar.

¶20

CM.APPL 42502/2016(stay)

¶21

Application stands disposed of in view of the order passed in the writ petition.

¶22

G.S.SISTANI, J

¶23

VINOD GOEL, J

¶24

NOVEMBER 16, 2016 pst

¶25

W.P.(C) 10841/2016

¶26

2/2

Raj Kumar Singh v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar Singh v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Kathuria Vs DDA & Anr.

Ram Prasad Vs UOI and Ors.

Rahul Birla Vs Union of India & Ors.

Anil Kumar Jain Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Kusum Lata Devi Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors. Vs Babu Lal Bunkar

S.N.Singh Rathore Vs Director of Education & Anr.

M/S Retax Electricals Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sh. Abhinash

Ram Prasad Vs UOI and Ors.

Manoj Kumar Sharma Vs U.O.I & Ors.

B.L. Jain & Ors. Vs UOI & Ors.

Jyoti Jaya Vs State & Ors.

Prasant Chaudhary Vs Govt of Nct, Delhi & Ors.