Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn, making the related miscellaneous application infructuous.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
SURENDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Puneet Yadav, Adv.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through :Ms. Puja Kalra, Adv. for respondent no. 1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 03.03.2016
Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous application
is disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
MARCH 03, 2016 rb
Surender Singh
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
