Three writ petitions were dismissed for non-prosecution as no petitioner appeared before the court despite a pass-over order on August 4, 2016.
Petitions and pending applications were dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 1-3. + W.P.(C) 1063/2003 MARGRA INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. ..... Petitioner Through: None versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla,CGSC With Ms. Priti, Advocate for UOI. Mr.R.K. Joshi and Mr. Jyotindra Kumar, Advocates for Respondent No.6. With + W.P.(C) 1124/2003 MARGRA INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. ..... Petitioner Through: None versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla,CGSC With Ms. Priti, Advocate for UOI. Mr.R.K. Joshi and Mr. Jyotindra Kumar, Advocates for Respondent No.6. And + W.P.(C) 22731/2005 &CM 17033/2007 CMA CGM GLOBAL INDIA P. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: None versus UOI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla,CGSC
With Ms. Priti, Advocate for UOI. Mr.R.K. Joshi and Mr. Jyotindra Kumar, Advocates for Respondent No.3.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 04.08.2016
S.MURALIDHAR, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
AUGUST 04, 2016 mg
MARGRA INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR.
UOI & ORS.
CMA CGM GLOBAL INDIA P. LTD.
S.MURALIDHAR
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
