Allowed
Maulik Bharat Trust v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/10319/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAULIK BHARAT TRUST ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Archana Pathak Dave, Adv. with Ms.Ankita Chowdhary, Mr.Virag Gupta, Mr.Gaurav Pathak, Advs.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Sunil Dalan, Ms.Rajul Jain, Ms.Rhea Verma, Advs. for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 02.11.2016
C.M.No.40591/2016 (exemptions)
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) No.10319/2016
now brought to our notice by Sh.Sanjay Jain, the learned ASG appearing for the respondents that a detailed reply dated 28.10.2016 was sent to the petitioner explaining all the issues raised by the petitioner. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
NOVEMBER 02, 2016 ‘anb’
W.P.(C) No.10319/2016
Page 2 of 2.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the cause of action survives given that the respondents provided a detailed reply to the petitioner's representation after the petition was filed.
Whether the petitioner was entitled to leave to file a fresh petition for further grievance.
MAULIK BHARAT TRUST
UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court