The High Court of Delhi disposed of a withdrawn writ petition. The court granted leave to withdraw the petition and disposed of miscellaneous applications as infructuous.
Leave to withdraw writ petition granted; WP disposed of as withdrawn; Miscellaneous applications disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43
LATE B.K. BHAGAT THROUGH ITS L.R. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Mr. Mukul Mathur and Mr. Kunal Aggarwal, Advs.
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (NDMC) ..... Respondent Through :Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rachna Golchha, Mr. Ravi Yvash, Mr. Govind and Ms. Pavhi Poddar, Advs. for NDMC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R D E R % 05.02.2016
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
leave to withdraw this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as
withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
FEBRUARY 05, 2016 rb
LATE B.K. BHAGAT THROUGH ITS L.R.
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (NDMC)
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
