The petitioner sought to withdraw the present writ petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
withdrawal of the writ petition accepted and petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
#27
$~
BANWARI LAL SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Ashmita, Advocate
versus
THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 08.12.2016
Learned counsel for petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition.
Consequently, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MANMOHAN, J
DECEMBER 08, 2016
rn
Banwari Lal Sharma
The Land Acquisition Collector & Anr.
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
