Guru Nanak Public School Vs Mr Davinder Kaushik & Ors.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA

J

^ 13 -

It is settled law that no appeal lies against an order disposing of a review petition.

At this stage learned counsel for the appellants states that in compliancewith the original orders dated May 23, 2013, review whereof was sought by the appellants, directing the appellants to implement the recommendationsof the Sixth Central Pay Commission in the school in question as per circulardated February 11, 2009 issued by the Directorof Educationpaymentshave been made in terms ofa settlementarrivedat with the teachers who have agreed to receive the deamess allowancenot for the entireperiodandat the agreedrate.

Learned counsel for the respondentsdisputed that all teachers have entered into a settlement.

We are not going into this issue for the reason it would require an appraisalof facts. We simply note that pertainingto the orders dated May 23, 2013 review whereof was declined vide impugned orders dated September 13, 2013 and September 17, 2013, contempt proceedings are pending. In said proceedingsthe contemptCourt would obviouslyconsider the plea ofthe appellantsthat a settlementhas been arrived at between the managementofthe school andthe teachers.

CM No. 1741/2014 in LPA No. 84/2014 CM N0.1746/2Q14 in LPA No.85/2014

Dismissed as infructuous. ^ i PRADEEP' NA NNDRMOG, J. pWrffiHARANI, J.

FEBRUARY 03, 2015/pg

Guru Nanak Public School v. Mr Davinder Kaushik & Ors.