Disposed
Sushila @ Babli & Anr. v. Rambir Singh
Delhi HCEX.P./347/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew execution petition with leave granted.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw execution petition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
27
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- EX.P. 347/2010 & E.A(OS) Nos.385 & 386/2011
¶4
SUSHILA @ BABLI & ANR. ..... Decree Holders Through : Mr.Anand Yadav, Advocate versus RAMBIR SINGH ..... Judgment Debtor Through : None
¶5
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
¶6
O R D E R % 03.03.2015
¶7
- Learned counsel for the Decree Holders seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the rights of his clients to file a fresh petition for seeking execution of the judgment and decree 25.8.2009, passed in CS(OS) No.717/2007.
¶8
- Leave, as prayed for, is granted, subject to the Decree Holders filing a fresh execution petition within the period of limitation as prescribed in law. The present petition is disposed, along with the pending applications.
¶9
HIMA KOHLI, J
¶10
MARCH 03, 2015 mk
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sushila @ Babli & Anr.
- respondent
Rambir Singh
Coram
AI extract
Hima Kohli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court