The Court dismissed the suit in default due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and file affidavits despite multiple opportunities provided by the Joint Registrar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
M/S MAGNUM STEELS LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: None. versus MUNIM PRAKASH ..... Defendant Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 10.09.2015
Vide order dated 28th May, 2014 defendant was proceeded against ex-
parte and the matter was listed before the Joint Registrar for 22nd July, 2014 for ex-parte evidence. However, despite several opportunities granted by the learned Joint Registrar to the plaintiff, evidence by way of affidavit has not been filed, inasmuch as, plaintiff has remained unrepresented on 18th November, 2014, 16th January, 2015 and 24th August, 2015. Even today, no one appears for the plaintiff.
Suit is dismissed in default.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2015
ga
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
